Kid You Not
Child-free and what's it to you?
By Melissa Starker August 15, 2002
Kids are sweet, funny and too cute for words. Or kids are loud, needy
and drool too much. It depends who you ask and when you ask them.
Even the best, most conscientious parents will admit that sometimes a
little darling can turn into the bad seed, at least for the length of a tantrum.
Most consider this a bumpy part of the responsibilities of adulthood,
the time when you should get married and have children. But over the
last three decades, more people have stopped wondering when they'll
have children and, instead, started wondering why they should.
Even 40 years after the Pill, it's still a wild thought, what with
family-friendly government policies like the Pro-Marriage Initiative
spending tax money supposedly to make welfare recipients better
parents (ignoring the statistics that prove a solid education and a
living wage would do a lot more good for their kids) and a constant,
pop culture barrage of photogenic infants (as in Friends and Sex and
the City). Most any woman who, for whatever reason, has not had a
child by a certain age can attest that her fertility is considered a ripe topic
for conversation among family, friends and co-workers, sometimes total strangers.
You'd think this would be a subject too touchy for Sunday dinner or
lunchroom conversation, as U.S. Census data indicates that more women
are remaining childless. The number of women in their early forties
who have never given birth nearly doubled in the past 25 years, to 19 percent.
The choice of career over starting a family right away has left many
unable to conceive by the time they feel prepared for kids. Some give
up thoughts of children under a partner's pressure. Bringing up the
lack of a traditional family just refreshes a sense of regret.
But there's something about the human drive to propagate the species
that turns a normally private realm into a source of common
speculation, and there's a growing minority who feels the need to
play defense when talk turns to kids. National Opinion Research
Center polls suggest that cohabitating without a marriage license and
having children out of wedlock have become more socially acceptable,
but the state of coupled childlessness hasn't gotten quite as much slack.
People who get together and don't procreate are often met with
responses from "Who's going to take care of you in your old age?" to
the other end of the reasoning chain, "How can you be so selfish?"
Women get the worst of it, fed scary statistics-which usually don't
wash under scrutiny-that after 35, they're more likely to meet a
terrorist than Mr. Right or, more recently, in Sylvia Ann Hewlett's
book Creating a Life, that if they are successful, they will always
be unfulfilled unless they spend part of their twenties landing a man
and squeezing out some offspring.
More women and couples in countries across the planet are tuning out
this noise and letting the world know they're not having kids.
They're not changing their minds. Get used to it.
The United States is one of more than a dozen industrialized nations
with birth rates lower than the rate of replacement. In Columbus,
according to numbers compiled by the city's planning office, both the
number of women living alone without minor children increased and
married couples without children under 18 years old increased
disproportionately throughout the 1990s.
This trend has become a major field of sociological study and the
subject of a growing number of books, including The Baby Boon, in
which Elinor Burkett unleashes frustration at preferential treatment
for parents in corporations and in Washington D.C., and Madelyn
Cain's The Childless Revolution, which allowed a variety of women to
explain their individual reasons for the choice.
Cain found that some women remain child-free out of valid
environmental concerns. The country's birth rate may not be at
replacement level, but we Americans do suck up an inordinate share of
natural resources and developing nations are making up for our
reproduction numbers. According to Stephen Hawking, if growth
continues as it is, in six centuries the world's population will be
standing shoulder to shoulder. Other women have a spiritual calling
that takes all the energy and care they'd devote to raising children.
Within the third, largest category of intentionally child-free women
are those who just don't think they're cut out for child-rearing.
They're on a lifelong career track, or they cherish private time or
unfettered intimacy with a partner. Some simply don't like children,
though they've learned not to bring this up in public. You might as
well say you love Hitler.
Some of the myriad personal reasons spurring non-breeders have seen
print, as in the current issue of Utne Reader, and been ranted on
websites like heartless-bitch.com and hissyfit.com ("112 Reasons to
Lead a Barren, Childless Existence That Ends in Your Death"). The
Internet has apparently brought the greatest supply of reassurance
and sense of community to people who have watched friends have
children with no desire to follow the lead.
No Kidding, one of the earliest social organizations for adults
without children, was formed in 1984 by Vancouver resident Jerry
Steinberg. He had lots of experience with kids through his own family
members and volunteer activities, but knew he didn't want his own.
Steinberg, like many adults (particularly women), had trouble finding
a doctor who would surgically sterilize someone who hadn't parented.
The doctors couldn't explain their reluctance to let Steinberg
exercise his reproductive choice, which spurred him to seek others
like himself and those still on the fence over parenthood. His
organization now has 78 chapters in four countries. There are three
in Ohio, including the one that just started in Columbus and, according to
local chapter co-founder John Stacy, a fourth is about to start in Cincinnati.
Stacy's wife Jennifer said, "I don't always like to be the one to
start things," but after seven years of marriage to John, she found
that "We were running out of friends! When your friends start having
kids, they're no longer available to go out and, at first, it's no
big deal. But then everything is focused around that child, from
where you eat to what you eat to conversation."
When an "adult night out" ended with friends singing songs from
Barney videos, Jennifer felt she had to find an alternative for their
social life, so she contacted Steinberg.
Like No Kidding's founder, the Stacys enjoy the company of children.
They acted as foster parents for a time for a relative's child,
Jennifer is active in the Girls Scouts of America, and both do family-
centered volunteer work through the Kiwanis Club. Ultimately,
Jennifer felt that "You have a responsibility when you're married or
when you live with someone to kind of look after each other. I didn't
want to do it for anyone else."
She admires friends who are mothers, almost all of whom have
sacrificed a career to stay at home, but she couldn't see it for
herself. "The whole thing, from being pregnant to raising a kid, none
of that was flashing bells or saying to me this is what I need to do," she said.
The choice has allowed her to focus on her supervisory position at a
credit company, and for John to become the first member of his family
to complete college. He's now at work on a graduate degree.
With the events they schedule for No Kidding members, like wine
tastings, movie nights and an excursion this coming Sunday to a
Columbus Clippers game, "It's a lot more relaxed," John
explained. "With parents the focus is on the kids, and this is how it
should be. That's where their responsibilities are, they're talking
it and living up to it. This is very casual."
"I think probably the coolest thing about the group is, because
you're in that right age demographic, the social pressure is not an
issue," Jennifer said. Luckily, both have siblings with kids to
divert judgment of their child-free status, but they have felt some
pressure to reconsider, especially from Jennifer's aunts. "I finally
said, `It's not going to happen,'" she said. "So hopefully my sister,
now that she's married, will step in there."
Though Mark and Margaret Minnich have careers and are near the end of
child-rearing years (he's 41, she's 38), their new marriage to each
other has brought calls from others to reproduce. Margaret, an
executive secretary, has been hearing the "When are you having children?"
question frequently from co-workers, and their families have also chimed in.
"We just set them straight," said Mark, who oversees contracts for
the U.S. Air Force. "We just got married in May. We're at an age where we
need to concentrate on developing our relationship, and kids don't fit into it."
"Most of our friends have children," he went on. "We haven't gotten
pressure from them, but their lives are child-oriented, and that
leaves us out." When the Minnichs saw an announcement for the first
No Kidding meeting in Columbus, they thought, "Hey, that'd be the
perfect place for us." More people are having that thought; according
to the Stacys, attendance and interested e-mails have swelled
steadily since the group began in June.
As for kids themselves, Mark said, "Let's put it this way, children
are great as long as they're someone else's and I can give them back."
This sentiment was echoed almost verbatim by Gailee Agin, another
newlywed. She and her husband Chuck were married in May and they've
been spared from much of the grandchild harangue by their respective sisters.
"We had a baby boom recently," Gailee explained. "We have nephews
now, which is great because I can get my baby cute quotient and then
hand them back. `There you go, Mommy wants you.'" At this young stage
of their marriage, Chuck's assertions that they won't have kids have
been met with "You'll change your mind" from his parents.
Though they're considering foster parenting in the distant future
("There are just so many kids out there that are broken and could use
any kind of help," Gailee said), they've decided not to add to the
population. Finances factored into the choice, as has a practical
look at their lifestyle and the realities of raising kids from birth.
With Gailee currently searching for full-time employment and starting
school next year to become a veterinary assistant and Chuck recording
his own music in time spared from his job in publishing design,
they're much more comfortable with the thought of being responsible
for the well-being of their three cats. "If you leave them home alone
with a bowl of food and water, the police aren't called if it's a
cat," Gailee noted facetiously.
"And [babies] screams are really loud and high-pitched," Chuck added
with a shudder. "It's upsetting. It's like listening to Japanese noise."
"You're supposed to grow up, have the house with a white picket
fence, start a family as soon as you can and then live the American
Dream," Gailee said. "Everything points to that, from television
advertising to food in the grocery stores. It's packaged for more than one person."
"When you tell people you don't want to have kids," Chuck added, "if
you say you're not ready, what do they always say? `You're never
ready.' Well then why have them? What kind of answer is that?"
A surprisingly common one. According to the most recent numbers
available from the Alan Guttmacher Institute, almost half of the
children conceived in this country were not intended at the time.
These single women and couples, either through contraceptive failure
or carelessness, didn't have the chance to ask whether they were
ready for kids, much less if they'd ever be ready.
Still, given the awesome responsibility of creating a human from
scratch and raising it to be happy and healthy, it's a wonder anyone
would try to impose their concept of family on another couple. No
matter what an author or your cousin or the woman in the next cubicle
might say, there is something worse than not having kids: Having them and not wanting them.
|